Judging psychoanalysis

We must stop stigmatizing psychoanalysis: if the neurological disorder is, the subject still more or less fragile psychic structure which he can not do without. If there is an accompanying form which does not fall into a psychic decompensation and stay there it is referred to the analytical therapies that just do not use drugs: it is rather the prerogative of behaviorists , neuro-psychiatrists exactly! Of course, psychoanalysis must recognize autism for what it is, this neurological difference in the risk of wanting to change the unchangeable: but we also know the plasticity of the brain, his sublime ability to adapt based on including environmental stress, and why not make empathic listening of the autistic one of the conditions that it rightly sees the other not as a "controller" and a "phagociteur" but as a "liberating words what we remember in a bubble in her throat "and that we address a double (at the risk of sounding schizoaffective ...) within the confines of his bubble? It is wonderful to know psychoanalysts who drop their theories, opting for the face to face and not the couch, which even know TALK to adapt to the structure and at the request of the person in front. Freud said "that the theory does not stop to exist," Lacan "that any theory collapses at the feet of the patient"; when Alice Miller speaks to shoot down the wall of silence, not with batons, not wanting to blame parents as a cause of autism by returning to childhood: no, it is also just be there for wall and ball return to a neutral voice that can not speak and only gets overprint within with the risk of emotional overload, emotional ... In any case, a good psychoanalyst denies the need contribution of cognitive and behavioral techniques or differentiated artistic or educational support: on the contrary if these devices serve besides giving life and voice and words on emotions whether positive or negative.
I believe every family, every being, in the order of its own history, culture must have the choice of the type of therapy that will allow it to address, and especially find DYNAMIC edges to be accompanied in the curve her life.
No one wants to be stigmatized, reduces, so do not do it with the others, it is the complementarity that makes the richness of a human being, no rejection ... and often we reject what we do not want deal or not by the yardstick of unfortunate experiences. Note that I am not a psychoanalyst but a disability who has experienced the horrors of psychiatry rather violently and I can assure that if my journey is not over the south of my life, I will never deny the work which was done in psychoanalysis sometimes stopped because of disabling disorders for I have learned to know me, to dare to ask ... and words precisely the freedom that was given to me was to see in diagnostics a database to differentiate from that found in a computer, or the design of a body governed solely by the mechanical and biochemical laws ... I was able to turn gradually toward therapeutic least Conventional I ranted against my therapists as anyone will in the long term - it also frees up a lot of energy in place to destroy ... (after learning to build actually I still do outside psychoanalysis with other tools ...) What I reject by cons are the psychiatrists who gave me many medications since my childhood and have not been in a damaged structure (physical social mental neurological ... .. .professionnelle) hypersensitive to the base ... and there it was NOT psychoanalysts (at least not adequately making use of psychoanalysis often psychiatrists oriented psychoanalysis and working in hospitalization) ...
In short, an article I like this psychiatrist who is helping me a lot (and it dissociates well psychosis autism ...)
[...]
Then read The autistic its double and its objects without prejudices, to discover valuable tools for both autistic diagnosed for one who does not dare to still be or is not and will ensure, for families who care for children who sometimes become great invent double or have "routines" on transitional objects: why not? Thank you to Mr Maleval for research and extension of his psychoanalytic skills in the sphere of autism.