This lens is not clearly the focus. If you do not really want to slip into the world of photography, which can be addictive so, but simply pulls the trigger only by Auto mode, then you should buy a good compact camera or zoom camera for the same money, what example does a Olympus E-520 with this lens , As you get at least in standard situations in good light clearly sharper images. When Lensflare and the distortion, the lens is better than many aforementioned compact cameras in the 400 range. On the Erten views that may be comparing apples and oranges, but it is not because my approach is: I have about 450 for a camera and what I buy now? One can learn the photographing with this lens. One can polarizing filters, ND filters, Grauverlauffilter up screws, you can not do in a compact. One can use a SLR multiple flashes simultaneously unleash etc. The images of this lens, however, are sobering. As I said, if you want to take pictures only in the holidays and everyday, you're better off with a good compact. And if you want to buy a FT-SLR example and the budget is limited, then with NEM used Zuiko 14-54er. As an FT-SLR comes only to bear and you get used already halfway favorable since it was replaced by the Zuiko 12-60. The 14-54 is a top objective of the Proline series that is even brighter than the successor 12-60 !!! The only reason for the 14-42 lens to grip would be just money shortages, and the intention of photographing to learn, with the above-mentioned additional equipment. Personally, I would but in this case (ie with money shortage) only buy a camera body plus a used Zuiko 14-54. Then you can buy the same filter with the matching thread diameter and then does not have to a time when you have tired of 14-42er lens and to a better exchange again to buy new. It's just unfortunately a sobering lens. My unique Tip: Better to buy a used 14-54er !!
