1.CD 2011 / Remaster 90: Virtually no differences. The sonic proportions are exactly the same. Minimal finer heights. The measured compression is higher in the new recording, the dynamics of 0.9 db less, but this is not audible. Overall: For this not worth buying!
2. Stereo 96/24 / Remaster 90: The recording is much more transparent and everything sounds cleaner and finer. In particular, the voice is spatial represents. Disadvantage is that lacks the compactness of the recording and some of the "punch". Overall, this is but a yoy but clearly audible progress. the CD
3.Surround 5.1: The distribution of the instruments in the room is good. In this regard, the mix has its charm. Negative falls mainly to the significantly dumpfere little transparent mix. The pools do not sound brilliant and the keyboards are much worse to hear. The snare and toms are clearly duller. It lacks the overtones. In addition, the bass is much stronger, but also dull highlighted so that the whole recording sounds relatively bassy and muffled. Pity! The distribution is good, the sound is not !!
Was tapped all on a very high quality system in higher 5-figure euro range. The video is interesting, but not alone justify the higher price. So you should think carefully about why you buy the deluxe version!
