Magazines only test in the laboratory

According to the newspapers Test 2.0 has received more and more points than 1.4.
I'm in this report only on the sharpness.

The 2.0 has a bright light conditions when the input aperture of 2.0
slightly better sharpness as 1.4 at f 2.0
In low light conditions or at smaller apertures and in particular at
Exteriors with infinite focus setting has the 2.0 to 1.4 no chance. The images are in the 1.4 much sharper brighter and show
I deutlichern colors. In the 2.0 here the contours relative to 1.4 are blurred. Even with an aperture of 11 you can clearly see the difference.

However, the 2.0 is certainly not bad value for money are the
worth about 700 more for the 1.4 euros each.

I stayed at this brief report my experiences without scientific laboratory terms
shown. Surely there are now professionals, for my statements to undetailliert.
However, the facts speak for themselves. What help me laboratory measurements? I as users Scan now not in the laboratory but in normal life.