Matt and good (ISS)

After I read a wide variety of opinions on this paper here, I entschließ me to try it myself and have won over quite a positive impression. (Canon MX925 printer). Have it with photos, graphics (eg Photoshop images), scans, etc. tested.
As was previously reported here almost anything about it, I would like to explain a few points of criticism.
True, the paper has a one-sided coating that is white, the colors clear, well fed and be able to reproduce high-contrast. The more yellowish underside is white, as it was dispensed with optical brighteners in paper. (It also does not look at the backs of photos, right? And it is not Photo Paper).
In order to distinguish the front from the bottom better help you if you hold them against each other - then you can on the packaging a directional arrow drawing (top / bottom), for better orientation.
For those who are not too good with this printing paper rausbekommen:
/ Make photo printing / matte photo paper: 1. pressure settings.
2. It is better to use Canon ink, or only change if you have been compared and found no major differences to the original. For comparison purposes, of course, always the same photo / Master Print.
3. Photo may edit first - of "poor" can not get out of "good".
4. It may be at the printer (too old, too cheap, etc.)
5. Who does not have a Canon printer, it should try, if possible with papers of their respective owners.
6. Who does not like matte, shiny paper should take. Practicality and preferences are considering.
Those who are of the opinion that because of the weariness of the paper could not tell the difference to "plain paper": Again make a comparison using a template - the difference is enormous. Normal papers can not absorb the ink so that tack-sharp contrasts and saturated colors are reproduced.
One must not forget that this is not a professional paper, therefore making such comparisons little sense.
Conclusion: good, really satisfactory photo paper, recommended for home use. (I do not work for Canon :-))