Here, the method of a sophist is not useful given the rigor and theories philosopheux Michel Onfray, contemptuous of the triumphant modernity by his exegesis on the history of philosophy, the Man and his condition, the question of religion, morality and "concepts" that are simplistic, schematic and poor justifications recent positivist and materialist system. Mr. Onfray is the egoistic wisdom!
If Mr. Onfray had good tests throughout his work, not revolutionary, on the contrary, these findings lead us to hedonism silly, simplistic and totally denying original sin!
Here, I speak to the unique Christian but takes original sin for the myth it represents, myth, universal and individual, truly human and eternally understandable, that of an original sadism or the will to power following the visions the world and the capabilities of each.
No intellectual depth sweat labor Nietzschean sandboxes (This is not a gratuitous insult, Onfray is very far from that there's more interesting to Nietzsche, subtlety and depth of his philosophy which is anything but a "liberal libertarian"). The author demonstrates with consciousness, that is, logic and ethics.
The comment can complete this by the phrase he repeated most often and which shows the paucity of thought of the great philosopher of the official system "do as they please without disturbing others"
Onfray thank you, but what do you think of this quote from Nietzsche who said, "We want freedom as long as it does not have the power But if we have power, we want supremacy.".
This quote just being an atheist and not in the traditional world, in the sense that in a traditional world, the supreme power is in god (s), not to mention lost methods, and the only way to take him this power is to deflect elites and society, that of Onfray, ie the deification of man and materialism, instead of spiritual. The circle is complete. Obviously, a human society and man is complex, these doctrines are as general systems.
It's funny to read a poor test evil where Onfray load the Marquis de Sade. But Baudelaire answer, like his response to George Sand, it is better the evil that knows that the one who is ignorant.
Michel Onfray is not a master in philosophy, but a champion of the decadence of the modern world. While it reveals more and more the true face of the system, Onfray, triumphing speaks of "libertarian liberalism", it would also be interesting from developing.
For this, I invite you to discover real powerful writers like Guy Debord, Francis Cousin, Stuart Ewen, Michel Clouscard etc. philosophers of being against having, quality over quantity, the spiritual over the material, and not too will shock the brainwashed brains of freedom, equality and fraternity! Otherwise discover the writings of Baudelaire, De Maistre, of Nietzches ...
Baudelaire and Balzac front of Hugo and Zola. Onfray just wants him to be celebrated, but "To want to move with the times, you die with the times." and Onfray, there was all periods.
Obviously this comment is synthetic and require an even greater development.