Not the fault of Garou

Most previous commentators have been scathing with this new cover album by Garou. Yes, of course, we are light years away from Notre Dame and all this period of his career and the beautiful body of Canadian tingled entire rooms and many housewives behind their small screens. But does this mean harp on this record? No, because before all is Garou who is having a field day on each title, and you can hear. Large resources have been released by Universal who can not afford a commercial misfires in these times of scarcity for industry.

So yes, a cover album of songs for most arch-known, performed by one of the biggest sellers today, surrounded himself with a bevy of beautiful studio sharks, there is no reason that it does not that sell coconut! No risk taking, nothing original that could incite sleeping ears, beautiful packaging, in black and white for class, with a big picture on it, that history is of course that people do not pass side and voila !!

Indeed, marketing uement-speaking, this is perfect, the dorfèvre work, beautiful work in short ... but what about art? spontaneity? the rebel side of the Canadian beautiful? There remains much that is true, but Garou is really responsible for or to t he had to obey the dictates of his new record label, unable to give an opinion too? The question deserves to be asked.

Hopefully next time, he will have ample opportunity to express themselves as they wish, far from mercantile considerations.

CREW.KOOS