Surely it is purely factual considered well made. And at least in the few places that should sound like Rammstein, going even to some extent. But in the whole, it has somehow a cheap touch. Also because I do not get rid of the feeling that sometimes do not want to really have something to do with each textually and key. Not only because it acts disrespectfully arbitrary and controlled by vanity, so it is not credible as a self-irony for me. He also invents itself by no means new. Despite its comprehensive musical education and its completely undisputed outstanding voice, he seems indeed to have always been satisfied with it, make music just as playing notes in a certain chronological order to be considered. Because it builds further on. First he sang on "Sincerely" in his way of virtually unchanged arrangements of the originals. Now he sings his songs almost unchanged with new arrangements. So he does what he has always done: He sings halt. An actual artistic ambition is not evident to me still. In addition, you could just Heinos songs even without this masquerade sing along if you wanted to because. And most of those who vote here positive, it surely see themselves more as a sort of joke at Carnival.
This is all the more unfortunate because the whole thing even has something positive, namely that it is searching for common ground, rather than to emphasize what divides us. This is done so at Rammstein anyway, and so great was Heinos distance therefrom anyway never. Because both are so, albeit in an entirely different way, a kind of pastiche Germany. (Here, for example, specifically the German phenomenon to "apologize" for everything to have, at home and outro of the CD) are also at Rammstein yes has always been a certain extent limits torn. Because here meets, intentionally or not, in addition to what is perhaps really Metal, what keeps it, to feel the frustrated housewife and the mediocre citizen who is tempted here subtle to really sleep as a cool sow, unfussy , straight ahead, the emphasis is always on the downbeat.
I am in principle that boundaries are torn down, but as I said is not consistent for me here is the motivation behind it, and then finally the execution. Also tearing of limits how it all at a price. And this is me here too high when doing the judgment is lost and everything sanded in arbitrariness and banality.
PS
The heading for review is an insight that I have taken in Ottilie's diary Goethe's "Elective Affinities". "The intellectual part finds almost everything ridiculous, the sensible almost nothing", goes on to say there.
Furthermore I'm already stumbled as I at Heinos first "outing" caught the shake of the head and had to conclude accordingly, probably to be humorless, at least in certain respects.
And yet I have come to a different conclusion. I also consider it to reasonably sober reflection still for
ridiculous.
Addendum of 08/02/2015
I have to correct my first paragraph: It works as Eulenspiegelei, because if one takes a different audience than I originally believed. This conceived in the affected reproached mirror not even realize is a small "blemish", the Heino probably love to take account of its actual drive in purchase, but surely you can not blame him.
