I have just taken the test on MacOS. Incredibly, read and write rates are actually tested beyond the 400MB / s with Blach Magic. I once made me look about: The whole is because MacOS and Win8 USAP devices (such as this case here) support. This is another work protocol, which apparently falst all the power of the USB 3.0 connection ausreizt!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The day before yesterday ordered, opened yesterday and tested today. The Inateck FE2002 HDD enclosure (SSD optimized) the new home my new Toshiba 512GB SSD should be (one of the fastest on the market).
Application criteria were the backup of the Macbook Pro Retina (15 "early 2013) and the data throughput with games on the Windows partition.
By housing the disk reached very good reading and writing values:
Tested with CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 in said Windows 7 partition on above Macbook. (All figures in megabytes per second)
Sequential Read: 231.9 MB / s
Sequential Write: 227.3 MB / s
512k Read: 205.9 MB / s
512k Write: 267.2 MB / s
4k Read: 13.27 MB / s
4k Write: 42.64 MB / s
4K QD32 Read: 16.15 MB / s
4K QD32 Write: 48.32 MB / s
Perceived performance has however increased as well. The Umsieg of a traditional USB 3.0 HDD to this is -if you the SSD also nutzt- sense.
Only the cheap-looking housing quality is a bit unfortunate for an otherwise very good product. I for one would also double the price to pay for high anmutendere materials.
