Seq. Read: 522.32 MB / s
Seq. Write: 298.05 MB / s
4K Read: 23.35 MB / s
4K Write: 106.83 MB / s
4K 64Thrd Read: 187.68 MB / s
4K 64Thrd Write: 227.50 MB / s
Access Time Read: 0.136 ms
Access Time Write: 0.195 ms
Read Score: 263
Write Score: 364 (!)
Score Total: 760 (!!!)
Copy Benchmark:
ISO: 461.56 MB / s at 2,33s (!)
Program: 161.75 MB / s at 8.70 s (!)
Match: 262.57 MB / s at 5.26 s (!!!)
Compression Benchmark:
Read: 497-523 MB / s
Writing: 339-471 MB / s
This is also made clear that the new SandForce 2200 controller currently leads the field even with incompressible data.
All in all, the Vertex 3 Read on Sandybrigde is in the 120GB variant only in the field sequential SATA-600 controller an advance (over 500 MB / s), but overall it ranks well behind the C300 a (C300 128GB 672 Score AS SSD! Vertex 3 120GB only about 550).
Who really wants to go into a new SSD era, can not get on the 240GB variant!
It is in fact the fastest consumer SSD (SATA, not PCI-E) on the market and the way it looks, the alternatives are the bottom line all subordinate.
Although one here but again the Church must be in the village, under real conditions, so talk OS boot, startup, copying, etc. one notices among all current SSD's certainly no significant difference - also not old for my three years 80GB Intel X25-M G2! The one would have been determined with a stopwatch. In this respect you also the 120 version of the Vertex 3 could then make a recommendation, or all SSD's unless someone comes from a normal "mechanical HDD.
Only one has already be clear who spends a lot of money for an SSD, will ensure maximum performance and does not provide the Vertex 3 120GB currently unfortunately!