It is important not to be discouraged by the first intervention due to a named gourdasse Nadia Geerts, which we spring the joke of Islamism which is the act of a minority, assuring us that we should not despair of the Quran through contextualization and historicization, that it is men who make religions etc ... Yes men do religions in general. With the exception of one, precisely, based on the infallibility of a prophet and an uncreated book (not inspired). Dogmas about which even the fiercest Muslim liberals seem to have no outlet. In short, yet who knows do the splits, Allahu akarambar!
The rest of this book is much more courageous. Everywhere the same observation: clothing exhibitionism, total regression of women's rights, street prayers communitarianism without discomfort, hatred and rejection of the culture of the host country ... The Canadian example is by far the most frightening: that which leads to reasonable accommodation policy. For the consubstantial expansionist Islam does not explain everything. It will also need the soil necessary for its development: guilty complacency exhibited by so-called intellectuals within universities, total submission of supplementary incidentally journalists, tetany elected officials who do not dare to apply the principles of the Republic, cowardice politicians of denial (left and right) who prefer to exclude from public discourse those who have the audacity to denounce the danger green shade gangrene. Political parties chose dishonor for peace. They will and dishonor and war, to finish quoting Churchill.
As for France, so I welcome the obstinacy of Joachim Véliocas, I do not share his optimism about the awareness of the danger by the media. Where is the awareness when the useful idiots, the collaborators, the traitors - what to call them otherwise - rehash us length of programs and articles that Zemmour and Islamophobia are the only real problems of France? They do not care about the escort boys and girls at the end of the ball, the Qatar regia.
