Enough of the envelope, then the inner life!
For me, USB sticks are first tortured tidy before I make my two cents.
# These include several HDTach / HDTune crossings to determine the burst read rate and while I noticed something I had not experienced in any drive.
When you first run immediately after receipt of the device the data rate is always between 120 and 160 MB / s were a permanent zigzag pattern (average 145 MB / s), the last race after several days / weeks, a mixed picture revealed. Spread over the entire width corresponded in total only half the former data rates, the course of the rest remained stable without outliers at about 103 MB / s, the total average dropped to 125 MB / s.
# Principle, it must be mentioned that the Lexar MiB / MB, so the 1000 / 1024er- "trick" really drives until Excess, because of the 64 GiB only 59.6 GB left over even after reformatting. Mathematically, all the way down to the byte level is correct, but a slight "Bes ***".
# A USB flash drive regardless of Coleur can only judge with real data when reading and writing. So I use different data sets with small, medium and large files, each about 1 GB.
Burst data rates as just by HDTune and h2testw personal interest only for the classification of different sticks, but have no practical Bewandnis - unless you write and permanently and exclusively reads gigabyte large ISOs ...
On two different computers (up to max. Three years old, and with fast HDDs), both with upgedateten NEC / Renesas USB3.0 controllers, gives the following result:
* Large Files (20-100MB, average 50MB) ... READ = 62 MB / s
* Mean Files (5-20MB, average 10MB) ... READ = 60 MB / s
* Small files (0-5MB, cut 0.5MB) ... READ = 43 MB / s
Coincides with my other USB3.0 flash drives.
* Large Files (20-100MB, average 50MB) ... write = 25 MB / s
* Mean Files (5-20MB, average 10MB) ... write = 11 MB / s
* Small files (0-5MB, cut 0.5MB) ... WRITE = 9 MB / s
No kidding, while the values are already rounded up ...
OK, not bad for write requests at USB sticks, but good USB2.0 flash drives also tend to these values ...
CONCLUSION:
=====
Would I buy the drive again?
- When comes to money, then yes.
- When comes to power, then NO.
Footnote: Although I have not yet 64GB Kingston HyperX chased by 66 Euro through my obstacle course, but I dare to say that there are certainly reasons for the doubling of the purchase price. However, I am not as ready cash my enemy to output only to a USB flash drive as much money as for a USB HDD ... ;-)