I am now no wall-photographer or agency everything possible to to see where the weaknesses are, as I would find something at each camera. Even colors are given again as they are. The reviews here where 3 Stars were awarded so I can not understand completely. Certainly not the 1 star reviews, but since one need only read the other reviews of jeweilen "Reviewer" then read you know what you can make of it.
As I said, I'm not a photographer nor a wall Pieper pixels or so but judging the camera what it does in practice ... and I can draw a comparison with the D5100 Fuji X-Pro1und for Nikon. Clear the 16-50 is not quite at the Fuji 18-55 zoom, but the performance is not as bad as you read it often in wide. Hide she need not prior to Fuji, the autofocus is perfect, it is fast, I can without any problems all day hold in my hand where my Fuji already causing problems.
Are best for such a powerful camera Zeiss lenses, but also the SEL50f1,8 is very good and shows what the camera is able to achieve.
I'm much more flexible with this small, lightweight camera, did they almost always present which is not as would a larger, it is ideal for my cycling due to their compactness.
All in all, it does its job well, very well, this one must not forget that the camera is only a tool and the photographer taking pictures. Knowledge I have where there is a danger that colors come out differently than they are and correspond respond or if the focus is not where it should be, which measuring field I choose and where I sit the flexible autofocus measurement point, or which aperture I need everything in the Focus range is where I want it. This allows the camera to the photographer not lose weight without thinking along as it gets.
What I want to grow me for the journey, the Sony SEL18105 and Touit32mm. When photographs of the Sony Alpha 6000 looks to Flickr, taken with the Touits, I'm thrilled. The SEL1650 remains then for cycling tours.
