That finished dry food is not intended for the sole use, but is just fed, I suppose. Also, I'm assuming that the average dog owner has his or her own opinion for feeding formed (hopefully before the acquisition of the animal).
Therefore, the list of ingredients is important, but not part of my review.
I leave the judgment here about every consumer switched itself.
I compare this with other dog food, commercial objects and I will not get involved in policy discussions.
The lining has been tested by:
two wire-haired dachshund females from 14 to 15 years, so seniors
two young Greek mongrel bitches who are accustomed from their home to eat from garbage cans and more greedy wegschlingen all
a Rottweiler dog neutered middle-aged,
Two Bernese mountain dogs of 8 years, so actually already elderly, a neutered male and a female.
The food is almost odorless, dry, crumbly and not so easy to store and to dose for humans.
The bag closes tightly.
The food tastes the dogs.
Consumption is in the middle range.
There will be no excessive thirst.
The excrement is firm without being too tight, stable and dry.
The development of wind (F ***) is almost equal to zero.
The coat shines, the castrated males do not take over the masses.
Therefore recommended precisely in the function of dry food thoroughly rock lining of mine as T and.