I get two units from the series for testing, it is practically the same edition, difference: once there's a facial epilator (9-958 to), once there's a rotor Brush (9-961) for replacement. The package is built internationally, and betextet in 8 languages. From the outside, not so easy to read the essential information. The back and the packaging are printed tiny. The units come in trendy slightly varied presentation, which affects only button and housing. Otherwise, they are identical. Test object was my own men's skin. Here there are zones that represent in comparison with the ladies the same challenges. And there are "extreme zone", which are particularly well suited as a testing ground ... First: in all sets is always a roller head and a shaving head included. In the presentation, in images, etc. is always on the roller head in the foreground. This technology is designed to appeal to women in particular. It is not cut, but plucked. This is a thorough and hygienic. That's the theory ... In practice clearly shows that each technology has its pros and cons. I can on the chest, arms and on his stomach using the rolling head very successful. Of course, this caused skin irritations, but nothing that is unexpected. After a quarter of an hour everything is ok always where the hair billow, place the roll enough attack. You have to work longer than with a razor blade, but worth it. What about the legs ?! Here the hair grow very flat, and correspondingly low is success. It is strange that advertising always aiming at the legs, because that in this case you will use other techniques. In both sets a shaving head is how it always uses "the man" already for the beard. The shaving head has a comb scissors and a circular shear blade, as you know it for decades. These two long-serving methods still make everything right. so you get the flat growth on the legs thoroughly removed. Or else, you reach for blade ... Everything as usual. This difference needs to know you before you can make a fair evaluation. In other words, in the context of technical feasibility of the Silk-épil scores well. I would not hesitate to recommend him for the male personal care. A wet application is possible, but on the fly in the shower promises no success. It takes the contrary longer. The brush seems to me abundantly superfluous. There are wonderful but natural products. The facial epilator, which looks like a nose hair remover, I can recommend. Of course, just for the eyebrows, and the main hairline. This is an application that you need frequently. Overall, I have to deduct a star, --for advertising, as always promises too much.
