the focus speed and image quality in low light conditions not up to scratch

A bridge camera has the right to strike in an appropriate manner, the bridge between the small, handy digital cameras and often acting as clunky SLR.
Thus, it is often so that all segments of the performance really beat around the ears and everyone especially want to say in the amount of pixels a word. I personally feel here the manufacturer should finally stop time and concentrate on the really necessary points. These include in particular a very quick response time, because only in the segment of a SLR could be attacked.
I personally own a very handy Canon snapshot camera "that shines primarily through responsiveness and beyond a slightly older but already digital SLR, which is still unassailable in their power the SLR this has only 8MP -. But this is sufficient for normal application areas of absolute . With these not rushing 8MP it was always possible images up to Din A3 size to enlarge to recognize without image Technical losses. One should never forget that the viewing distance with increasing image size also increases.
Now I'm just someone who does not always want to lug the SLR with all its objectives, but also to make easily high-quality images that are a little away from the pure snapshot "but - but this should necessarily also easily possible ( Which brings us to the reaction rate again).
Now I wanted to with the present bridge camera solve this situation and, at least with the specifications of the power diversity they seem to be able to cover it without any problems.
Here, however, it is so that the camera touches both positive and negative aspects that are pleasing but just as often annoying sometimes.
First, the camera has a big problem in low light situations and moreover it comes with the speed of focusing not on at the ever-popular snapshots. Neither my little snapshot camera yet (which is clear) SLR show my weaknesses here.
But one puts in return value on the art work - with the corresponding end time and the right setting aperture - then the Finepix leaves nothing to be desired. Nevertheless her be chalked up as a bridge camera just forced should cover both fairly sent despite need.
In addition, they met but very often reach their limits, and shows a significant noise.
The electronic viewfinder is not really great pleasure - simply because it is electronic and therefore lags behind somewhat. The display in turn can only be used adequately depending on the ambient brightness. This problem possess but all displays.
It is now in this price range, of course, difficult, it can be right for everyone. The Fujifilm tried a huge balancing act, which on the one hand easily overwhelmed the absolute beginner to the functions provided on the other hand leaves the ambitious photographer unsatisfied with missing properties.
Sure, the camera can be good in the hand and the way you can shoot even what they actually done pretty well.
The lens has a reasonably good light intensity and ensures clean images, if you do not come to the said border areas of light and / or necessary focus speed.
However, the fundamental question of whether someone who wants to make quick times a reasonably good snapshot, should not simply rely on a small digital in-price segment from 100 to 200 euros. The ambitious photographer should take a little more money in hand and perhaps directly access an SLR without bridge detour.
But In conclusion I would like to announce still positive that the camera has a pleasant weight, good in the hand and I'll probably give her the odd chance - especially as I take my SLR only on special outings and hope yet do not want to give up entirely.