I have read this book with much incentive to finally be hugely disappointed as alleged certainties; then we hit bottom! There is everything; the Gnostic Gospels, ancient Egypt, with a touch of heresy sauce "Rennes-le -Château" when we know the negative impact of Gerard de Sede on the history of the Knights Templar, the Cathars, why not give a layer with the Priory of Sion is a hoax. We do not put a conclusion on theories or ideas. Page 332: "Jesus was a magician ...... he distracted the crowd" in delirium there we swim, why not Garcimore for that matter, especially to affirm both online later he was doing this for establish his reputation as Messiah, for the Children of Israel awaited by Hebrews is a magician exorcist?. Not frankly I understand why, inspired by this book which is nothing but a succession of hasty conclusions and mixtures without foundation Dan Brown may have the commercial success it is.
