What about the light that does not want to see?

I read the book to get further idea after watching the documentary on Arte.

And as I expected it comforted me in what I already thought.

It is very easy to use the distress of the people to be able to excuse our excesses. Yes our excesses. A company wants to sell products in order to earn money and make us work, she said AC aidra the third world. I did not know that Monsanto like many other companies in the same style but in different genres (eg total) were purely humanitarian and philanthropic purpose. And you?

How can some believe that fabriquante company Agent Orange and other products of the same accabit, who lied shamelessly (and even his own countrymen) and has dozens of deaths on the conscience, can still be believed and worse heard and defended by people quite thoughtful and intelligent?

No, made the tests are not reliable and are certainly much more rigged than the courageous story of Ms. Robin. Why do I say courageous, just because he has. Just look how many people are "opposed" to Monsanto found themselves on the straw or even denigrated in their own person and their work.

If Monsanto were dignified and was in good faith, it would show the "serious" and truly reliable tests she did before the sale of its products. At present she is hiding behind pseudo explanations protection work. Too easy.

In use its products are not dangerous and they will help destitute families? Tell that to the families precisely who lost poisoned children, or to those of these Indian farmers, who thought the sirens of Monsanto and who have found so much in debt, because the fabulous crops never came, were sucidés.

Go also say this to all those farmers (of which American BCP) which were left with their crops collected on behalf of Monsanto because a few strands of a particular GM plant found themselves in their fields.

How can we consciously and willingly trust a company that use "mercenaries" to go check in ways completely illegal that this or that person does not have its famous products in their fields (most also contamination and not by seed)? How can we consciously follow a company that uses threats and promote denouncement?

I am not against GMOs, the only thing I want is real transparency in all honesty, with real tests done for years. I also want those who live near or use GMOs are protected and can actually make a living. But above all the living that does not belong alive and not to shareholders.

However not only the stone checkers Monsanto or others. No, we are also responsible because they let us do. As long as it does not affect us directly we are not concerned. AIDS, for example, has become national and global cause when rich countries have been affected, the problem of animal meal that entrained the scandal of mad cow ditto. The same Eriqua yet.

So ladies and gentlemen, yes GMOs in the current state of affairs are a scandal and certainly much more dangerous than what some want us to believe, therefore do what it takes, no longer buy product from this company genre, instead of saying it's a shame and a lie compared to the third world do the third world do not need these GMOs or of such products. Defend the bio, support the various service clubs in poor countries, help our farmers.

Take example, and support the companies as Nestlé has imposed its producers do not use GMOs. This proves also that companies can make money while respecting nature.

Read, study, and mobilize ourselves so that our planet is the planet of all men and not that of companies which acquired the living. Because if we let our children tomorrow will belong to those companies.