As always, I divide my review in the following points. The importance of the various points can then be determined by each itself.
> Graphic
> Gameplay
> Story
> Multiplayer / Multiplayer Maps
> Positive
> Negative
> Your own opinion
* Graphics *
Whether emphasis on graphics or not is oneself leave. Graphics are not the most important part of a game for me. A well-designed game with relatively poor graphics is dearer to me.
The graph of Ghosts is .. Well, say Ok? It is not a projection, it is not a step backwards. She has remained in my eyes about the same. There is nothing which would now strike me as a particularly eye-candy. Of course it looks broadly better but it comes at the shooter competitor (Everybody knows what I mean) not ran, any more than at AC BLACKFLAG. Whether this is a point I predict buying the game why not I dare to doubt. The graphics are as I said Ok but not the best.
* Gameplay *
Also in the gameplay itself did not much. It's just a COD as we know and "love" or even "hate". I would now occur spontaneously nothing has changed. Well you can if you want hinliegen from the Sprint Now slip some "feet" and then finds himself on the floor again. However, whether this is now a renovation dare I strongly doubt.
* Story *
The story is the reason why I ever distribute star of Ghosts.
As already mentioned, I put a lot of emphasis on story and its plot.
COD was what the story has always been one of my favorite terms title. Sometimes more sometimes less. Personally, I find the campaign or story very well done. At the very beginning when you'll find yourself on your spaceship station again or even afterwards if your with your dog runs through the area for the first time.
But this is of course all a matter of interpretation that I might find interesting on the story can also be construed by others as negative. Can As for the story of OA competitor not compete, for example. Compared to the Ghosts Story is a joke this from competitors.
* Multiplayer / Multiplayer maps *
So and now .. we come to the whole evil.
As mentioned earlier, some people have is the multiplayer mode unreasonable. The cards are no longer as they used to know. You are in my eyes for a COD now much too big and confusing. No attention to detail. Nothing Breathtaking. Quasi a tinnitus in the eyes - you only see pipes. That I so loved COD Feeling simply does not matter. I think here you have far too much trying to follow your competitors. But what was not good in this case.
The new Class Editor and soldiers selection I personally find miserable. What are you doing? Why should we change something that worked? Yes of course we want to change and innovation, but it has to be better, and this is not in my view the case. The incentive for leveling missing. The Abschusserien are useless. What excites me most is these SatCom, what in the world ?! Where is the old known drone? I'm really not a man who likes such a rating distributed but the multiplayer is in my view simply that what it was not. Frustration instead of pleasure, at least with me.
* Positive *
> Good story in single player
> Standard COD gameplay.
* Negative *
> New Class Editor
> Abschusserien
> Cards are too messy / too big for COD
/ Join> No incentive to levels vorran.
* Own Opinion *
So I am in conflict with myself whether I should regret buying or not.
Who can afford it, should look at it and decide for yourself.
The story is like saying well done and the only reason I ever forgive 2 stars.
I personally have the Kokurrenten of COD avoided so far has unfortunately confess that I have changed, at least as far as the multiplayer.
For Productive criticism I stand always at your disposal.
Cheers.