Solid All-in-One Wonder

With epilators I have some experience I've ever been involuntarily tested another epilator on Vine, namely Braun Silk-épil 3 epilator 3270 - With 2 essays (including shaving and trimming attachment), and I have to say that out of my admittedly perhaps somewhat unworldly view of a male tester the device from Panasonic at least as well as the likes of Brown; but makes not the last star from which the two devices (the Brown had 4 stars) could separate. With the significant price difference (40 vs.> 100) I miss just too much that a feature which, for example, my wife always crying afterwards: analgesia. So far there has been no manufacturer - including Panasonic - get the series to build epilator where it writhes in pain, if you use them for the first time. I went there at least. My wrist (which also had to serve at the Brown-device for the test) is also flushed with the Panasonic equipment and the actual removal of the hair should be banned as part of a revision of the Geneva Conventions.
But: The Panasonic equipment delivers useful results; even in the jungle-hair (see the pictures that I'll still upload). It is in this case but not extreme by the much cheaper device from von Braun. Here, however, still a but: I have in such a short time, the whole attachments can not test (and want). Here the Panasonic equipment took a clear lead - especially in the manufacturing quality and the quantity of articles.
Features of the package have already been touched upon my pros reviewers sufficiently, but we summarize briefly together, why just the many essays are a good idea (albeit one as "incorporated" is only once needs - not that one false attachment used): you get attachments for arm / leg depilation, for the machining of the cornea () at the bottom, twice for the bikini zone (seems to be very important) and even dull for shave?!. Did I forget something? Anyway, a very broad portfolio, in which "men" -Multifunktions razor hardly come. Trimmer might still have been nice ;-) Also for the bikini line perhaps.
No matter. These features bring at least (!) 1/2 point more than the brown-device, but even gel (I once that taken by my shaver) and other tools such as hot or cold water does not help with the Panasonic equipment, the almost unavoidable razor burn to relieve. So it does not help that the device on battery power (!) Can also be used in wet areas. It comes so hopefully nobody on the idea that take part with an attached power cord into the shower ;-)
As a craftsman I am of course totally fascinated by it that the Panasonic equipment brings a (Attention) LED lighting to perfect the nail .... ... ahem find the hair. I know that so far only of cordless screwdrivers and am fascinated by what you still so everything can use this idea. I want also to my razor!
About the handling (the unit is just as big as my hand) can also not argue, but rather on statements such as "strong battery" or something. I wonder how other reviewers want to have found that. The battery lasts more than a shave by, yes - and it is also within about 1 hour reloaded (is also back on the device for which it is interested) hit, but over the long term durability of the battery is thus no statement , Fact: The battery is now fitted as standard fixed and can not be exchanged. Power the battery so the bending, then only (if at all) mains operation possible. For a device in this price range might even be seen as a shortcoming, after all, batteries wear parts. Since Panasonic but commonly provides very good battery, I would do me no worries here.

Conclusion:
In Overall, the Panasonic wins in that it is wireless and wet, so to use for example in the shower. All the essays make him, in my view not a "All-in-One Wonder", but a "Jack-of-all-trades", which is basically the same thing, however, please understand so that these "Jack" anything can, but not everything is perfect. Due to the relatively narrow shape example is inferior to "processing time" in larger areas of the Panasonic equipment in the wider; at the same time are the results that will surely consider special equipment such as the ball of the foot compared to the supplied cornea rasp hands down. Therefore, just a "Jack" and no "Wonder" ;-) If you "just" one of the additional features needed, then the device does what one expects of it - but it just will not work miracles. So please do not go zoom with excessive expectations. It's a bit like a Swiss army knife: What you need is there ... but if I want to pinch by a wire, for example, I also prefer a side cutter as the Mini-pinching of the knife. A total of 4 1/2 star with an upward trend.