>> The Philips has in my opinion a very good value Leistungsverältnis.
>> I've found no other device in this price range that meets my needs and at the same time has such a low energy consumption. Our previous Samsung 3D LCD with 46 "had a much higher power consumption. This, and the fact that I have long flirted with a somewhat larger TV, was the reason of purchase.
Clear, energy values are indeed not everything, but in this day and age these values play a not inconsiderable role. (Depending on how often you use a TV)
>> Lan connection is working properly.
>> The image is simply impressive. Main stations are very well presented. Again, could not keep our Samsung. Also the sound is pretty good.
>> 3D films are really great playing. Again worlds differences to Samsung. Philips has a stronger effect of depth in my opinion. The glasses are lighter and more comfortable to wear.
A tiny drawback:
>> I think it's a shame that Philips HDMI cable no delivery attributing what is to be understood in such devices. Instead, (no kidding) was a scart adapter here. Also, no 3D glasses here are (clearly, I knew beforehand, but if they advertise 3D glasses should be at least 1 The package includes)
Due to the history and the LG 3D 55LM620S was in closer range. Alone because here you need not use rechargeable glasses and polarized glasses are quite a gift in proportion to the shutter glasses. But by comparison, I realized that the LG 3D effects were not as good. The image is very fuzzy in comparison. This effect has unfortunately put on many devices on the pole-glasses. But even without 3D makes the Philips a much better picture. Since image quality is important to me, the decision to buy was clear.
Ultimately, everyone must decide for himself where his priorities lie :-)
CONCLUSION: Would buy it again at any time.
