A comparison of translations Klossowski (Folio) and Wotling (GF)

The elegance of the French translation of Pierre Klossowski is dazzling, but some passages are rendered unclearly as in the following example. It can be very useful to have also translating Wotling (less elegant, and sometimes less clear in places) at hand to understand what Nietzsche meant.

An extract of the aphorism 11 of "Conscience" by Klossowski:
"Was the Conservative link, infinitely stronger, instincts, was not it exercises under the regulatory overall, humanity would perish due to its perverted judgments, his delusions to the state of Eve, his unfounded and credulity, in short, its very consciousness or rather all these phenomena without humanity would have disappeared long ago. "

What are "all these phenomena"? The list of delusions of consciousness that has been listed? "The conservative instincts link"? But this is a singular.

A look at the German text of the end of the sentence:
"Oder vielmehr, ohne diese Längst jenes Gabe es nicht mehr!"
Nietzsche does not speak of "phenomena" is a literary freedom Klossowski to translate "jenes" which is a singular and means "that."
This is perfectly reflected in Wotling:
"If the Conservative group instincts do not infinitely surpassed in power if he did not exercise overall a regulatory role: humanity inevitably perish of its judgments in the opposite direction and his way of dreaming with open eyes, its lack of depth and credulity, in short precisely his consciousness; or rather, not IT, it would not exist long! "
And we can understand that "it" in the singular refers to "" the conservative instincts of the link. "