Then maybe the 890

For razor itself: If Philips can ultimately evaluate only the razor itself, because the shaving heads are hardly different in the lower price segment. However, I had assumed that this shaver also slightly better with the holes would have, since the Philips Aqua Touch website was unfortunately misleading. The absence of the beard trimmer I had overlooked. My stupidity is of course no reason to denigrate the device but this: The handle is made of a soft rubber unpleasant that probably should be handy. I think it feels disgusting and it is clean and not bad abtrockenbar (if there is the word).
The shaving head can be used only with a great deal of fumbling after removing them again. For hygienic reasons, a simple rinse in my opinion, is not enough at Philips shavers.
Anyway, why would anyone buy this device, when the AT890 (with beard trimmer, quick charge and better shaving head) hardly cost?