Generally, one has to say that a lot has happened with all providers.
The finishes are simple and intuitive, the packets with viruses, adware, phishing, banking, mobile protection very comprehensive
and fairly easy to install. Even with Kaspersky lasted less than 20 minutes.
Arguing at a high level would be that Kaspersky after the installation gets the updates and not as others have while.
Call handling and go easily from the hand, there was no crash or hanger.
The scan time varies greatly on the hardware (SSD vs. magnetic disk), amount of data and what to turn on everything at the tests.
So you can have a complete scan through in 10 minutes or even go in between the movies.
Major differences are not noticed, purely from the feeling Kaspersky is slightly faster at normal files,
in packed archives slightly slower than Symantec.
The Total Security Package here allowed use to 3 devices based on Windows, Android or MacOS X.
But the latter is more window-dressing, because malware uses frequent weaknesses in gatekeeper and XProtect from,
which no common antivirus compensated.
More seriously, however, the Kaspersky probably used even earlier OpenSSL code that allows
that a secure connection itself may be forced into an unsafe mode and is vulnerable.
Stand the end of April is Kaspersky Total Security still vulnerable to so-called Freak attacks.
HTTPS filtering should be disabled according to the settings if possible.
Man in the Middle is for encrypted connections anyway rarely a particularly good idea.
Conclusion. Many see in virus scanners Schhlangenöl that security pretending does not exist.
And it is true that it depends more on common sense, whether to catch a bit.
Nevertheless, for me is an antivirus package nevertheless a useful addition,
because even if you pay attention, you can not prevent everything on the quality of some attacks.
Kaspersky Total Security in its current version is only for Windows and Android systems recommended for HTTPS filtering is disabled.