OK, but would be less more

You can really complain against the cycling computer does not, especially at the price of so many functions. But everything I do not like: the square of the numbers is getting used to, so you have to look very closely in order to keep for example the (square) 2 and 7 apart can. The Sigma has in earlier and not more expensive models even better hingekriegt and one wonders why this retrogression? What is actually advertised as a benefit, the amount of functions is, for me something backfires. For example, one of my favorite features, display the temperature, one must first navigate through other parameters such as fuel savings due to bicycle use. This feature I think anyway ultimately for frills, because the routes that I train, I do not go by car anyway, what must be done some kind of eco-conscience massage. The time browsing in the darker seasons with is most important for me is not, in the main, but Nebenmenu how stopwatch for subsections (honestly, looks professional, but how often do you need it that it takes precedence over the time has?). Because as each individual has different preferences sure, my suggestion would be to Sigma: the menu navigation to revise so that you can adjust the order of the functions displayed even if you like. Overall, however, a very solid, versatile product, which I do not advise against.