Often the products are structured: There is a nice anecdote to find the entry in the article. However, after coming no education advice, but a kind of overview of all possible ways of looking at the problem. Instead of summaries or results followed by a reader survey (50% of our parents reader think that ....). So no one but is helped.
The items appear indecisive. As a rule, the respective author does not resolve the issues raised by him. I had the impression that you want it to please everyone was. I wonder if "not offend exposure" in the editorial the sign hangs.
In addition, I had the impression that handled uncritically with some commercial products and services.
For example, was always the "BabyBjorn" carrying system recommended without the criticism of this product mention (possible postural because squat spreading attitude impossible and overstimulation, if the child is not being worn towards the body). Or did I read an article about Baby Courses (Pekip, baby swimming, etc.), was mentioned in the not that there is general criticism in terms of early intervention, has been mentioned that a potential health hazard to the baby swimming starts (standing in the Federal Health Gazette that it can not be ruled out that disinfection by-products in infants lead to asthma and baby swimming not recommended).
