Getting to the point necessary

The author explains it well in his foreword, she thought Michael Jackson guilty a priori starting to attend his trial. It was the number one indicator of biased media behavior that turns that versions of the charge, and attended the collapse of the accusers and witnesses in the absence of concrete evidence of the prosecutor, and realized that, perhaps, she had considered too soon Michael Jackson.

This book describes well the trial, the content of the testimony and evidence, the CV of witnesses ...

The author did not hesitate to do his mea culpa, at a time when it was difficult to dare to say that Michael Jackson was innocent. This book was published well before the death of the King of Pop, she had also struggled to find a publisher, because it was then more vendor to write slanders and scandals. I want to thank Aphrodite Jones for his ethics, seriousness and courage to have defended Michael Jackson at a time when it was hard to take, unlike its "colleagues" who have turned their jackets after opportunely June 25, 2009.