The operating system I really like, visually much more sophisticated than Apple's iOS. However, I'm still missing a few small settings such as Folder from the tiles, since many apps also quite many tiles need to be pinned. But that might come.
But some rather rare Apps fail me. But one can get over also. Commerzbank, comdirekt I have not found. Worthy replacement for Outbank 2 there's also not entirely successful. For a similar app. Depot Apps lacking even more, at least I have not found anything.
For Nokia 820th
I like the device really good. 4.3 inches, I feel as optimal. Better than 4 inches from the iPhone 5. The speed is super. NOKIA Apps are also very good. The build quality is great, the battery cover I still can lose weight easily. Some points can think me but.
The battery was charged by me several times and should have reached its full Lesitungsfähigkeit. Nevertheless, I have to charge the battery at rather low usage to 3/4 day. At 2-3 short calls, SMS and Internet short visits manages the battery until the evening. With intensive use but the battery was sometimes even after 5-6 hours yet. 2 days battery of other recessions I would like :-) Anyway, does the battery of iPhone 5 longer. Charging at the outlet takes 2:15 hours (iPhone 5 and 2:15 hrs.), Which might be faster in both. Especially if you only have a car charger, it is difficult at the NOKIA with a charge. Let you use Navigon on the Nokia. Since the battery is supposedly empty after 5 hours, although it depends on the car charger (iPhone5 + Navigon invites normal). That I can well imagine, since the MacBook charging takes much much longer. If you were a 2100mA Autolagerät, it would likely (better) upload something. You could buy a second battery for 10 to yes, but you can always charge the phone only. So also rather pointless if you have to charge the battery and replace again internally. Because I'd rather have a larger, but fixed built-in battery. After 1-2 years, the unit is always sold.
The display is quite good for me but could be a bit sharper. The colors are rather gaudy - something VIVID style. At the sensitivity of the display is nothing to complain.
The camera has more enttäsucht me. I made a interesshalber compared to iPhone 5. The images appear in the Details muddy, generally the images are paler than in reality, and the light / dark contrast, the iPhone better. The light / dark contrast is also the problem with the video. People in the shadows were more difficult to identify (area tended to all black), and it was neat ausgeläuchtet the iPhone 5. But for the Nokia has a larger wide angle, a 4: 3 and 16: 9 format, iPhone 5 4: 3, but a Panorama function, which stitcht the photos very well. Well, the iPhone 5 will cost for EIA also 180 more, but this is also due to other components and the Apple margin.
In addition, I find the Nokia little too heavy and too thick minimal. This is better, as you can see it on 720s. For me, the more rounded shape like better than the Square when iPhone 5, it is simply much better in the hand.
A few times I also had the problem that calls for about exactly one minute were simply canceled. That did not happen to me with the iPhone. Always the same reception (as the same place) from me and the person on the other end (iPhone 4). Latest software on the Nokia.
With LTE I managed to a 800 antenna 42Mbit / s DL. That works well.
If the battery will last longer, be the instrument ansich something thinner and lighter, the better camera and the display slightly sharper, it would be the perfect machine for me. I think that Nokia is on the right track and the successor in 6-12 months can really be very very good (850?). At the moment I'm still thinking if I keep the Nokia or wait for the iPhone 5s (6) and hope for a reasonable LTE chip in the iPhone. This can the iPhone 5 for the Vodafone 800 and 2600 frequencies currently not.
