Good single-player, multiplayer Well ...

I would like to say in advance that I have played all the parts of the CoD series, as well as its competitors of Battlefield- and Medal of Honor series. First the single-player campaign: a somewhat complicated but interesting story, the action never stops and a lot of nice ideas like characters from previous CoD parts and a nice level diversity, weapons and locations. Perhaps held a bit too short (approximately 6-8 hrs.), But when a good story is told and the Action is true to me rather than a 20-hour dahinsichende wannabe voltage. Now for the multiplayer: The what was the real reason to buy any CoD series sooner degenerates here to bug lastigsten, unausgegorensten and "nichtzuendegedachtensten" Multiplayer is I've ever seen!
The multiplayer part of the previous title Modern Warfare 2 had been criticized too complicated and too confusing to be just for beginners and novices. New, not well-balanced weapons to powerful killstreak, complicated Menüs..usw. If you, however, recorded only once, it is seen through quickly.
The new part will make it much better and sweeps many good elements of its predecessor and brings in new unfair game elements. Tagged: remote-explosive charge! Also to give all the 13 year old campers and jumpers such a powerful weapon in the hands is probably the biggest mistake of balancing and helps quickly when the frustration factor to drive up! For example, a game of went more than 20 launches of a player on the account of this weapon! Add to this the estimated every 3 game due to connection problems and host search is canceled! For contracts purchased, met challenges and high kills the reason not include an outrage! Permanent judder and stills despite DSL or high transmission rates are included as well. Too bad missed chance! Battlefield BC2 almost anything is better and with the announced Vietnam add-on of the king will be glad Shooter Battlefield!