To the film itself is to say first of all that we have here, since the film of the Disney Company dates back even, probably see a fairy tale, but made so beautiful and charming that one can only say: If it is not true, so it is but at least well invented. Tom Hanks appears here as extremely sensitive, wise, equipped with infinite emotional warmth, charm and empathy psychologist who has to penetrate the ice sheets of cynical creator of Mary Poppins, so they allowed him the film adaptation of her book. This keeps Disney actually a self-centered and narcissistic Hollywood Fritzen.
All key personnel at Disney, with which the author has to do with acts of formula accordingly (we remember: the film comes from the Disney group itself) as good-natured, big kids, you immediately close to the heart and as Mr. Disney himself their see purpose in life is to make people happy by showing them the world again as magical as it appears only through children's eyes. But as I said, that's all been so beautiful and not at all cheesy that it is a no matter when this reality is oversubscribed sentimental.
Meanwhile, the audience learns in flashbacks the real biographical background from which the author has designed in the form of processing sad childhood experiences, the story of Mary Poppins: Her father, who called in the title of Mr. Banks, was a wonderful person, who the Dreams taught, but even so much hung with the head in the clouds, that perceived him all over the world just as no-good loser and what he became an alcoholic. The result is their fear that a silly film, also might frustrate the Musical, the essence of the story of Mary Poppins, which was to do justice to the dreams of her father late dignity and justice.
The best scenes are the ones where the movie Disney gives its genuine, empathic understanding of the author expressed by comparing its employees towards Mary Poppins with his own creation Mickey Mouse, which he described as very own creation, as own flesh and blood, at Early in his career would have sold to the money in the world to a sleazy publisher, or where he granted the author over the extent insight into his soul that it was never his to windy doing business, but rather about the storytelling, the fact that both of them has starred early ill, healing undergo at least in the imagination again and so perhaps again to give others hope that by making similar.
As I said: If it is not all true, it is at least very well invented, beautifully made and played. I can see in this film similar to the mood forth different kind, but also very well done and his stylistic means onset as perfect: "Nixon" (1996) directed by Oliver Stone. Say "Saving Mr. Banks": films that can be enjoyed due to their craftsmanship, even if one should keep in mind always that one sees no documentation, but just a reality überhöhendes tale that how well the film Walt from would the world perhaps can do a little bit better, even if it is not true. Because it's better if people can still dream and the dreams can come true maybe make a little bit, but that the world perish in their own callousness and cruelty to their own suffered pain and injury.
