How I wish I would have kept it :-(

If the image quality would have voted more often, because love to take pictures makes them scary.
I am not a professional photographer. See most of my images no enlargement on A3. Bridge cameras are exactly right for me. Wide and Tele in one, and you do not have to lug much.
I can do a bit what has already been written here only to confirm. I have now tried one week.
They came with the firmware 1:02. Also I had a slight Skylight filter partially with
in use. To say is this rough. Low noise is. Many images in the evening, or in rooms without
Lightning were made were good. The atmosphere is so obviously better retained. So here's the software of the camera makes really a good service. The colors have me FZ28 not so confident in comparison to my Panasonic. The wide-angle to max. (24) works at nearby objects (eg. A ship before it is) good, but in the distance, for which he is probably the most used, as it looks partially blurred. But here you also goes indeed a compromise one with such a lens. In general it is however better about 30mm. Some functions of Kam are quite impressive, but unfortunately less to use. For example, the Panorama function. She puts the images together very blurred. Mir has not been able to get here a sharp panoramic. The old way is to put together on the computer here to draw before. Even with high contrast and green colors, it has a problem with the sharpness. Green often are dull. The videos that I have made have become super. The hand push ore here is a disadvantage .... ok ... but it's also actually a cameras Find :-).
What remains to be said:
The 3 star I have given, because in my opinion the most important thing is the quality of the image. And here is often spotty. The control units, which are mostly used a clipper like me, might work ordntlich but
many pictures I took with the HS10 (300), were not satisfactory at any point. 200 of these are made with the Skylight filter, here easy to see color enhancements in direct comparison were. Times the sharpness of the color is super, it is not. Or the color matches and the image is washed out somewhere. It's funny, sometimes I had the impression that if an image that you do twice in a row, one good, the second is any worse. Should not be actually, but did. Under optimal conditions, but it looks quite good. In direct comparison with my FZ28 photo, I find that here the Panasonic makes better pictures. However, only up to ISO200. What use to me the beautiful features and the great range of 24-720, if a majority of the images are nothing. I am also one of those who often want to sugarcoat anything, but here I can only agree with the mixed opinion unfortunately. Of course you can with good software some correct, but I do not buy the camera to align each image after. Whether here Fuji can judge something about the firmware to be seen. Especially since the chip's built into the camera in other models, where he achieved significantly better results. But waiting for me is too risky and too expensive. Here I'm going to watch the forums if there are improvements, we'll see. Because as I said, it has very fun made me ...