In direct comparison with LG

In direct comparison with LG

2 player splitscreen polarized glasses - quality - compatible with Dual Play of LG, Full Screen Gaming Philips SimulView Sony and Dual Gaming Grundig (passive 3D TVs, no shutter glasses) - with glasses bags and cleaning rags - same technique, but no 3D Glasses (Electronics )

Customer Review

Did these glasses sometimes tested because no customer reviews were available and I wanted to make me a picture.

First to try:

Top Shipping, Top customer service and overall a very nice and sympathetic dealer.

When the first model I had, unfortunately the problem that a glass failed in Polfilterung and I disappointed sent the glasses back.
The merchant offered course immediately to spare, but I strove for a presentation of technology and in terms of time could not take any further risk more I refused.
So I picked up then too the original spectacles and made on the glasses offered here a review of my experience.
When I discovered a message from the dealer in my mailbox, I was surprised because the dealer tries to negative criticism to improve something I did not know in the form.
So I was therefore asked the glasses now again to undergo a one to one comparison and then to share my impression again.
Of course, I also wanted to know whether something qualitatively improved and so I agreed.
To better explain I have again added to the existing three pictures, which you can see on the item page.

How it works:

Dual Play or Full Screen Gaming operates on the same principle as 3D.
Here, however, not two images are created for each eye, but the screen is split horizontally or vertically and stretched to two frames.
The glasses have then do not like the 3D glass for each image but two glasses of the same, which gets its own full-screen each player.

The glasses in comparison:

As can be seen on my inflicted images are the original glasses bit wider, whereby a greater viewing angle is ensured.
But this will almost offset by the curvature of the model offered here.
The wide temples of eyeglasses like me very well, since they prevent disturbing side light.
The material of the frame is in contrast to the original spectacles extremely stable and has a very high quality.
The glasses have proper hinges on the temples and not simple connectors like the originals.
These are a little stiff, but can be any time relax with a small screwdriver.
The forms for the nose are almost identical in both eyewear and provide good support.
Comparing the glasses these glasses with the originals falls a only a very slight yellow tinge to the leaves colors appear warmer.
This is also not disturbing, as it is known, for example from her sunglasses and falls on only in one to one comparison.
This is certainly due to the thickness of the glasses, because I want during the original glasses with paper thin here say come along, the glasses of these models are at least twice, if not three times as thick.
Comparing the course Polfilterung falls a first on the negative contrasts likes to creep into the picture of the other, where they produce apparitions.
After prolonged use, it falls a little but still on and especially in racing games to get to the little disturbance to focus.
We must certainly not forget that this technique is still in its infancy.
This is due to appear in both the original as well as in these glasses available, as well as equally strong.
We could find no direct comparison qualitative difference more and also the problem with the different degrees of filtering of the left and right spectacle lenses is no longer available.
Of course, the more stable framework and thicker glasses glasses have a negative effect on the weight of, here we have the originals 14g and 24g in these glasses.
The higher weight same glasses but simply so the fact that they sit through the bracket better than the originals.
The design of the glasses is the design of the original course unbeatable better and also the bag made of microfibre offer a better storage place than the plastic of the originals)

My Conclusion:

Who wants to have entry into this technology of course looking around and comparing price / performance together.
Since I can to our test virtually every only advise to take up these spectacles.
Because these make a significantly longer lasting impression and the originals are high in nothing more.

Thanks again also to the dealer for the effort he has invested a lot of success for the future.

The right weight! Rank: 5/5
May 25
superb cuisine Rank: 5/5
February 22
Slight disappointment 5 Rank: 3/5
May 6
conquered! 41 Rank: 5/5
November 14

Related Reviews


In direct comparison with Bose Companion 2 Series III losers ...Yamaha NX-50 TV Sounbooster (2x 7 Watt, 2x 3.5 mm jack) for PC / tablet and smartphone orange (Personal Computers) My direct comparison with the previous model L810Nikon Coolpix L830 Digital Camera (16 Megapixel, 34x opt. Zoom, 7.6 cm (3 inches) RGBW LCD screen, image stabilization, Dynamic Fine-Zoom, Full HD) Red (Electronics) Direct comparison with the Gaggia Classic Old building type with aluminum blockGaggia RI9403 / 11 Espresso Machines Espresso Machine, frother, stainless steel (houseware) Quality in relation to the price acceptable, 5811000391 but inferior in direct comparison with the PARATToolbox toolbox toolbox toolbox 50x25x23,5 cm (tool) Direct comparison with "Intenso" and the standard "Espresso"Nescafé Dolce Gusto Espresso Buondi, Bondi, coffee, coffee capsules, 16 capsules (food & beverage) In direct comparison with Sigma 18-125mm clear front!Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm / 3.5-5.6G ED VR Lens (Electronics) Very good with small drawbacks - direct comparison with Bose SoundLink MiniJBL Charge II portable Bluetooth stereo speakers (2x 7.5 Watt) incl. Li-Ion battery (6000mAh) (Electronics) Disappointed in direct comparison with Nikon 18-105mmSigma 18-125 mm OS HSM Lens F3,8-5,6 DC (67 mm filter diameter) for Nikon lens mount (Electronics) Very cute mouse, but in direct comparison with Logitech but not so good.Speedlink Decus Core Gaming Mouse (Laser sensor, programmable keys 7, internal memory, DPI switch to 5000dpi) red (Accessories) In direct comparison with Night breakersPhilips White Vision xenon effect H4 headlight bulb 12342WHVSM, set of 2 (Automotive) the direct comparison with the competitors ...Phottix Varos BG II Multi-Function Flash Shoe Umbrella Holder (Electronics) Direct comparison with the Tamron 18-270 mmTamron AF 18-200mm F / 3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro lens digital (62mm filter thread) for Sony and Minolta (Accessories) Direct comparison with the Tamron 18-200 mmTamron 18-270mm F / 3.5-6.3 Di II PZD lens for Sony (Accessories) In a direct comparisonCan not Take Me Home (Audio CD) A comparison with the 1 Speaker Music man ......MusicMan MA Soundstation / stereo speakers with built-in battery and LCD display (MP3 player, radio, micro SD card slot, USB slot) Green (equipment) Who Fire TV advantages a detailed overview and comparison with FireTV StickAmazon Fire TV (Electronics) The world's best pocket camera - and a comparison with Sony A6000, Fuji X100S and X20Sony DSC-RX100 III digital camera (20 megapixel Exmor R sensor, 3x opt. Zoom, 7.6 cm (3 inch) display, Full HD, WiFi / NFC) (Electronics) Comparison with Diodorus 60cm to just under 30 €SEBSON® 50cm LED light strip 580lm (Replaces 45W-50W) [Warm White - LED strip bar SMD 0.5m] Fulfilled expectations under Windows and a comparison with the Magic MouseLogitech M600 Wireless Touch Mouse (accessory)