Interesting for singleplayer

I've played the game only in single player mode and it made me very convincing anyway.
The game itself is based on the capture-the-flag-principle. In the area there are several points that need to be captured and held until the enemy is pushed back as far as that he has no way to post new.
The gigantic terrain, the various possibilities, what kind of soldier you will (Sniper, Anti-Tank, pioneer, paramedics, etc.), as well as the freedom of how to run the war ever make Battlefield 1942 always exciting:
If one has no time for the open fight you sit in an aircraft and bombed the enemy terrain, or you sit down simply to assist at an antiaircraft gun or a mortar to his troops.
Other benefits include speech in the local language (even the Japanese speak Japanese), the very handsome graphics with pretty water effects as well as the many different terrains: the African desert, Russian forests, the Pacific islands, even in the half-destroyed Stalingrad can be played.
Also, the widespread belief that the bots are too stupid I can speak again, the computer is often much better able the individual units combine to say that it can be very difficult to fight through a street in which three snipers have invisible to the player, posted and you will still bombarded by fighter pilots to.
I prefer the game from a star that the music reproduction is sparsely goes thereby losing a large part of the atmosphere. Furthermore never need the other soldiers of the team help the player; although radio has the opportunity to call for backup, the soldiers never make use of it. If one does it itself, it is unlikely that you get support.
Last criticism would once again that the developer did not trust a game program that would indeed be historically different, but rather extending the match would comply.
Perhaps the idea of ​​Nazi-occupied Europe would be a deterrent, but I wonder why, when I was in Normandy successfully precipitate example the Allied invasion, the Americans were able to establish a bridgehead in France but in the next mission, so I I may fight with them again.
Thus, it makes no real difference whether you win a mission or not, the next mission will be run the same way whether you as an axis of power all the battles won, the last mission plays yet in bombed-out Berlin.
But apart from that is Battlefield 1942, a more than solid mix of strategy and historical first-person shooter that can one prepare many hours of fun by the ascending, difficulty, which never loses the character of a challenge, and the sometimes uneven balance of power of the opponent ( number of combatants of both sides can be increased).
Despite everything, one can not help but notice that the multiplayer part to the whole thing the final touch is because on the one hand you can really check with his comrades and also go for two in the tank (which avoid the computerized soldiers rather) to Secondly, it is nevertheless simply more satisfying when you know that now someone is sitting on the world front of his computer and angry because just his plane was shot down.