Kafkaesque trial

The subject is interesting, but spent the first pages, the author bogged down in theoretical shortcuts, its dogmatism (scientific Marxism redolent of the 60 PCF) and its contradictions. For example, it takes up the idea that Nietzsche said anything and everything and then make a citation anthology along the lines of his demonstration (to make fast: Nietzsche is a kind of pre-Nazi and all those who adhere to a part of his philosophy are potential Nazis). Too bad because the author seems to have a good philosophical culture! In short, we ended up attending a Stalinist trial remake, which still reads to the end because its author wrote rather well (hence the 2 stoles).