This book is more addictive than the first, but does it always s "acharner in extreme barbarism to demonstrate that a monster really is one? The events seem more plausible than the first. But yet the fantasy is always an excuse in the book to get out of situations that are implausible. And this mixture is still too bountiful to that one, is found between Celtic mummies, secret societies, crazy inventors, doctors Frankenstein, all give a mixture a mixture too indigestible; it's a shame because the plot is well done and we want to know who is who and how it will end. Sensitive souls refrain because some descriptions of all Gore.
