So much for the practical test :-) We finally want so that a cream does a good job ourselves. She certainly does!
But I was curious about what was actually so plugged into the cream. Often employed to not be with what you so on the body applying (or at food ... eats) Since I was quite surprised - and not positive. Less recommended ingredients like multiple silicon-based materials from "favorable" oil as a substitute for high-quality vegetable oils. Various chemical substances that are not suitable for natural cosmetics (this does not count these eye care course). Environmental agents such as dimethicone and palm oil. And a little "DMDM hydantoin," capable of releasing the product / the skin formaldehyde ... and this can cause irritation and trigger allergies, is classified as a suspected carcinogen.
There are also quite eye care products beyond the more expensive natural cosmetic products that can demonstrate consistently recommended ingredients, the manufacturer Beiersdorf should reconsider whether it is not also doing better maybe once. Based on the ingredients, of course.
Each consumer has to decide for himself whether he wants to be there so critical or whether he does not care. Then this eye care it was recommended that is good in the use, handling and caring action!
For me personally 2 star deduction for the information contained harsh chemical ingredients instead of high-quality vegetable oils and sustainably produced palm oil.
