And it works. Sometimes on the verge of rupture, on the razor's edge. At several points the book lacks switch, collapsing in combat "good words", including abuse "eristic" strings Naulleau: bomb Soral issues then blame him for not having responded as some (in suggesting that the questions left unanswered thus hiding something shameful! Soral eventually use the scheme at a time, to show that it certainly is not fooled) while responding to transform all the work in a monologue 2000 pages, ad hominem attacks diverted (by not attacking fighter, but people around him), etc ... We feel that Naulleau, unable to win in terms of pure ideas, where it is pressed regularly in the book we still have to say, looking fault, error Soral. He knows the blood: so he purposely distorts answers (Soral with the challenge of having to constantly synthesize complex issues, leaving a boulevard Naulleau to make it say what he did not say). It persists on the subject of the Holocaust is Jewish (albeit a central topic in Soral, but not unique and more subtle than that Naulleau would show). And it almost works: at times, Soral, very annoyed, has no choice but to get excited face this dandy posture, the rhetoric strings (ie disconnected from actual ideas), of those who do not wet, that's critical of the one who takes the risk of delivering a true thought.
What seems clear is that first Naulleau does not serve the soup in Soral. It is not a hidden maneuver to promote the "left of the economy right values" soraliennes. This has been criticized Naulleau and I do not. This is certainly an unequal battle, where a fighter dodges more than he carries the shots, but a fight nonetheless and I think sincere Naulleau, which is to his credit. What is also certain is the knockout inflicted by Soral Naulleau in terms of ideas (besides the two men, on the bottom, converge on many points). I better understand the reaction of right-thinking media-political caste on the subject, which must be regarded as very productive against such a book. For we must not hide it: Soral is a winner of the duel, despite its annoyances, despite the penalties that sometimes pikes are fly.
A book I highly recommend, if only by the quality of reasoning, freedom of tone, culture, today classified as dissident ideas stifled by media caste orders, the ability to show that even completely opposite, dialogue (for lack of reconciliation) is always possible. And it's in combat, just accepted that truth emerges best.
