This book gives me mixed feelings: It consists of 4 parts - A preface Charbonnier 7 pages - A 23-page preface Morisson - Discussion between Eben Alexander and Moody 85 pages - A post-face Jean Staune 13 pages Ironically, the body of the book, discussions between Alexander and Moody is the least interesting part. We do not learn anything new from the book of Eben Alexander Proof of paradise As against the post with Jean Staune is fascinating. It is a masterly synthesis of the matter. The researcher is of rare intelligence, to me he understood everything that question. This is the kind of person I would love to meet one day. When is a book of John Staune on this? In the meantime you can read our existence Does it make sense? Scientific inquiry and philosophical
