Solitude.

Henri Guillemin was perhaps one of the last people in search of truth, with all the difficulties and all the risks that entails. The antithesis in short of our university to almost infinite adaptability: collaborators during the war with brilliant Carcopino, Stalinists at the Liberation with Sartre and others, structuralists Foucault and Lacan other, neo-liberals after the fall of wall, they do not seem to be in competition in the spinelessness and obscurantism that our journalist friends. Great destroyer of all impostures, Guillemin has the courage in this book to tackle one of the most blatant scams historical: the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789. It demonstrates brilliantly and seamlessly that, far from being a guarantee for progress and the people's rights, this statement is that what we today would call a "language element" in clear terms an advertising slogan to deceive this same people and make possible the total enslavement worse than under the old regime, for the rising bourgeoisie, uneducated and without compunction. It is understood that the thesis of Guillemin, uncontradicted to date forbid everyone in our ruling circles who believe universalistic and globalized. Yes, in the end, the Revolution has been a revolution rentiers (who did not took for trans-human neo-nomads).
A default argument (before you argue, you have already learned to read and stop believing that Botul is a philosopher), our Orwellian neo-liberal propagandists have diverse and varied advertising media to discredit any idea contrary to their immediate interests . First, Guillemin would be a Catholic, so a corny and a reactionary: no luck, Guillemin is also one that has assailed all frauds and crimes of the Church, with a virulence that could envy number of anti-clerical. Let's try something else: Guillemin would be an old geezer totally forgotten by djeun's trained in the school if the late Richard Descoing emeritus teacher. Bad pick again: thanks to editions of Utovie we can not thank enough, Guillemin has found a new enthusiastic readership, which demonstrates that we can be young without necessarily being brutalized. There remains a clincher agreement, Guillemin is competent, agree there is nothing in his books that could fall foul of the law, at least temporarily, but crippling crime, Guillemin lack of method, and method, that's it! Think a little: this individual did not put footnotes page_ you know that no jamais_ bed, in addition, there is no bibliography, and, last but not least, it is expressed of clear, accessible to everyone. You understood, Guillemin is only a popularizer, and popularizer, there are vulgar. It would certainly more than those poor bastards can learn a little!
So, if like me, you are vulgar, not very convinced by the propaganda of our official historians, read Guillemin, it will help you live happily until death.