My legs (also shoulders, since it is then smoother and more beautiful) - I already felt epiliere ages. By being able to participate in this test program, I have already tested some (well-known) epilator equipment and dispose over a pile of comparison.
This well-equipped model from Panasonic ES-ED90-P503, is a master of appearances! It comes with a lot of (cheap) accessories therefore, will operate without a cord (with battery) - but working "smoothly for two", ie, the epilator has 2 tweezers roles!
When it comes to the result, I am relatively satisfied. Very fast and reliable so I can epilate my legs - my pain is not pronounced because regular epilation. There is also a reliable shaving / trimmer attachment and a quite practicable cornea rasp attachment! The whole thing - you go, that's just a subjective impression and has no effect on the valuation result - still looks exactly as it is printed: Made in China. Please understand, but "quality work" looks different.
POSITIVE:
(+) A device that works with two pincer roles at the same time, carries away quickly much (hair). On the legs the (rapid / effective plucking) may be beneficial.
(+) In addition, a small light, to detect vestiges ---- necessarily useful and well implemented in this model.
(+) The unit is reliable, has a lot of accessories and you can in the shower / use in the bathtub. But one can only with battery (charge not forget) operate. (Downside is here also: When the battery is defective, the device should be noted special request!).
(+) A distinct advantage is the convenience that by (wet application) offers itself. While showering to epilation just is a good thing because you do not present your legs and do not have to clean off (a lotion or body lotion afterwards "is recommended absolutely!) Yet elegant - in the bathtub.
(+) Although the cornea Peelen is not recommended with this Grater role under water so you get corneal edge to the heel very effective way.
(+) Is a shaver / trimmer attachment on the field again. At least the first few tests say: Total sharp thing! (Cleaning without problems possible.)
,
NEGATIVE / What I love about this model is not sooo well like:
(-) It works (when compared to its competitors) cheap, wobbly - which added a subjective impression is - and unfortunately the two-roll system is to make matters worse, even striking impractical (expensive!) To clean.
(+) Cleaning brush included!
(-) The collected hair gather under / between the two rollers and it is also possible with the brush not so easy herauspfriemeln how you want it. Cleaning under running water is strongly recommended. But I notice that you for once again must also wasted a lot of water until the hair has all out. Again, I know of two well-known competitors, in which the cleaning means less work.
(- - -) The essays are more than just wobbly, but downright loose. The other day I noticed the ordinary protective attachment to one of epilation on the two rollers stakes out and I have very bad pinched me under the armpits, the Hauf. (For me, every other test has been done with this model in place.
(-) Another annoyance was the guide for me! Since the source catalog is like a narrow notebook against it! One may say that you do not need such a handbook forever, but my experience has shown that it wants to see one day precisely how this works with the battery and see if there are accessories or spare parts - and at this point I must, for example, BRAUN praise: Great handy booklet, which I can tuck with the bag easily and bring forth in trouble. That is with the Panasonic-tome a real absurdity ... What do I do with the tome, I do not know, in any case I will not be able to keep him in the bag and when the device is then something, I'll search for it , I find totally wrong. (But of course, in every language you can imagine so ...) If I am therefore included one day with the tome in the bathroom, I may as Swahili and Japanese learn from the fibula ...
,
In comparison test? Very good cut, neee - better well-plucked ;-)
I made to test this equipment once after 2 weeks growth a parallel testing with a competitor. Each leg depilated with another device. From pain (feel) and the outcome --- everything is relative comparable. The Panasonic unit is traveling much faster. But stay here also - you realize that not from a distance! - (?? Torn Have the hair here) a few stubble (1 to 2 mm) over which you do not get away with more pressing. In addition, the cleaning is a bit cumbersome at Panasonic.
= -> Runtime and battery charging is totally comparable in at least two well-known competitors !!!
,
Long-term experience -> Supplement for another 3 months in use. Under NEGATIVE I have added the following point and changed the rating of 4 stars to 1 star!)
(- - -) The essays are more than just wobbly, but downright loose. The other day I noticed the ordinary protective attachment to one of epilation on the two rollers stakes out and I have very bad pinched me under the armpits, the Hauf. (For me, every other test has been done with this model in place.
As I - as inserted above - so unpleasant and long-lasting injuries under his armpits've gained, I discard the appliance hereby prematurely - and change my rating of 4 to 1 star.
(That I know the attachment is dropped during epilation, was not an isolated case. Here it brings, epilation bikini area or under your armpits, painful pinching of the skin with them.)
Please understand, however, a device at the risk of injury is not at all. The manufacturer should necessarily make improvements.
---
If you enjoyed or helped the review, I would be happy about an assessment very. In this way, to know whether the effort has paid off the reviewer. Thank-You! ;-)
