I used to be a committed buyer of expensive brand watches. Based on my experience acquired with so-called "cheap watches" but a rethinking has with me in this regard eingesetzt.1992 I needed after a sudden loss of my Tissot watch just before a vacation more quickly get a timer, while my choice was a Casio-cheapy for! 5-DM. After the holiday I wanted - before replacement of a brand watch - just out of interest test times how long such a cheap product actually holds. This test was then (with this Billiguhr) over 16 years, until I lost the clock in the spring of 2008 while jogging. As a substitute I naturally chose a successor to my Casio lost. Also this procured in May 2008 model (Digital Quartz W 201) was to a labor a few weeks ago, in which I with full force slammed the clock against a doorknob, einwandfrei.Daher I have now bought the same clock again. In 2008 lost Casio Digital Quartz (built in 1992), I found the way, a year later on my running track again. The 16-year-old clock (with 3.Batterie) had "wintered" in foliage. They still ran flawlessly, display free of condensation, only the adjustment were a little stiff. This Pre Sent to my review. The model W 201 (purchase May 2013) corresponds to the purchased by me in May 2008 model. I want the Casio Digital Quartz Clock W 201 described as an everyday watch with an excellent price performance ratio. The clock is comfortable. it is light, hardly feel the arm. The setting buttons for the functions of the clock are sunk, so you can stick to fuzzy sweaters or the like in order not. The accuracy is excellent. The average deviation of the month is 6 seconds. The time display, especially the hour and minute numbers, even for people with mild vision defects well still visible enough and on the bright display. The clock is against vibrations and shocks rather unempfindlich.Sie my height is several times from about 1 m fallen on stone floors. The information about the water tightness is accurate. Whether in rain, or pool (at (forgetfulness) in the shower, the clock is running without any problems further. The time stamp on the pure beyond functions are sufficient. (Daily alarm, stopwatch, automat.Kalender, 12/24 hour format) only weak point is the plastic strap from resin, the (so every 2-3 years) must be replaced relatively often. But that is expensive clock often no better. All in all: Those looking for an inexpensive, robust use Suhr, has 201 well-served with the Casio W. Because of my positive experience so far: 5 points
