In fact, what is known as the modern form of synarchy would have been a conspiracy to same inside of the Vichy government in spring 1941 by a secret society gathering Polytechnique and head to which are Messrs Bouthillier and Berthelot ( respectively Minister of economy and transport minister) this cabal would include a large number of senior finance and public works. This rumor is naturally taken by the Parisian collaborationist press (At pillory and Lappel) embroidering on the allegedly mysterious death of a character shrouded in mystery Jean Coutrot.
In reality, this case is essentially constituted by the government lamiral Darlan became vice president of the Vichy Government Council after léviction Pierre Laval and Flandin lintermède. Presumably as the fact that the author of publications in the Paris ultras collaboration are mostly activated by Otto Abetz, Ambassador of Germany, Pierre Laval and friend with whom he developed a close relationship: Abetz who chose Laval with whom he estimated share a common destiny on the future of French collaboration, it seems logical that he wants to destabilize lamiral Darlan, although before the turn of events he will eventually receive Darlan as an acceptable replacement card. Moreover it personally met Hitler and he "expressed the government's willingness to continue the policy of collaboration." The problem is probably in the fact that lamiral Darlan is novice in terms of political choice and accepts a minister team that undoubtedly includes technicians ministers. The author rightly points out that this tendency to the appointment of technicians was already a habit in the 3rd Republic and the ministers in question are what we know today under the name not necessarily rewarding technocrat. And that this technocratic influence on French politics will be further strengthened with the release, under the Fourth and the Fifth Republic by creating Lena. In 1941, the case against Darlan, including Henri Dumoulin Labarthète is having recruited all members of the Worms bank, in other words the representatives of "trusts" and "dargents powers." Regarding the links with the Worms group they are undeniable for ministers like Pierre or Jacques Barnaud Pucheu and François Lehideux is a customer of Banque Worms as the Renault factories have an account there. The two characters that intrigue as the French collaborationist circles are Barnaud Jacques and Gabriel Le Roy Ladurie who heads banking Worms since 1936, and of course as is normal in such a plot there is an obligatory character "Jewish" Worms Worms Since summer 1940 with Rothschild, Lazard and Louis Dreyfus a prime target in the Paris anti-Semitic press. The situation is difficult in the context of "laryanisation" of Jewish property (this is to say, the forced dispossession of Jews), under the German legislation applicable in the occupied zone Worms Hyppolite is not Jewish because mother 'Aryan' he is also married to an 'Aryan'. However certain shareholders of Worms group are Jews making the company liable to theft actually Laffaire will be managed master hand by Gabriel Le Roy Ladurie that will become indispensable to the German Commissioner Commerzbank facilitating operations in France this dune entity skillfully and very prosaic.
Furthermore, the presence of technicians ministers like Pierre Pucheu Barnaud or (which is the bane of some Parisian collaborationist) is not condemned by the German authorities nor by ViaMichelin Parisian collaborationist press contrary to expectations of Jean Luchaire and Marcel Deat. The nickname Banque Worms conspiracy sest deflated itself, however, Whiners will try to bounce Laffaire with the mysterious death of John Coutrot presumed would be the all-powerful head of the organization that would sprawling synarchy. This propensity to delirium complotiste originated in the hunt for secret societies undertaken by the state French, understood that the secret society basically requires hear Freemasonry banned by Vichy will make public the list of actual or suspected members such as lodges Masonic, which were considered to be the haunt of anti-national forces under the 3rd Republic, a similar effort being undertaken dailleurs area occupied from Paris by the German authorities.
Pharmacies struggle against secret societies are described meticulously by Olivier Dard and shows how a structure can dinduire and dentretenir spontaneous and frenzied manner synarchic a conspiracy purely imaginary.
The personality of John Coutrot is analyzed in detail and that analysis reveals how a harmless character, having essentially a consulting dingénieur activity (he was graduated from Polytechnic lEcole well, X-Crise member and various think tanks) that eventually suicide for very serious personal reasons becomes a fantasy character, the central figure of the Movement Synarchic dEmpire (MSE), a kind of shadow government pulling the strings of the puppets vulgar political dintérêts financial services (the famous 200 families).
This rumor and fantasy synarchic sinsérait in a very conducive to this intellectual diversion period. It shows how the press and the handling informaTION with a strong emotional connotation (Judeo-Masonic conspiracy. Plutocratic plot associéetc) can have a strong impact.
The myth of synarchy persisted in post-World War or the Communist Party sest thoroughly appropriate the myth of the powers of money (the 200 families repetita bis) and has made a new scarecrow Jean Coutrot by presenting "giant of French fascism" (sic), we see very well that lon is in a delirious logic that feeds on its own revelations.
Extreme right will recover as the theme of synarchy in abject Dhenry Coston who was mandated to investigate the Vichy secret societies. This man was a notorious anti-Semite (CF the collaborators in the collection Plural: Henry Coston: dun Semitic route) which continued its "work" for the benefit of a public eager for dextrême right mix muddy revelations Judeo-Masonic conspiracy and technocratic conspiracy
On confidential instances of economic thinking, the work of Mr. Dard however, are less convincing, and without seeing the trilateral a secret society (paradox from the time when its existence is known), I think he should not be any confused.
There are lobbies and pressure groups, trade agreements, monopolies, and large schools danciens networks including France whose existence is proven and studied by political science and sociology: these lobbies and networks of influence play a considerable role in democratic societies without their purpose is undoubtedly the public good. However, these social phenomena deserve a cold and lucid analysis, without resorting to the questionable category of secret societies and their various avatars.
