Fine example of biter! Eric Zemmour, so cruel and direct in his criticism "literary", seems to have a little sloppy yet a book that does not lack breath. Views of its construction (cutting in arbitrary chapters acrobatic overview of our history), the style (p 153. "They ignore the pacifist ... that fascinated to Hitler's Germany far as they had taken of empathy for that of Stresemann ';' oufff) and the clarity of his statement (p 150: ". the famous> French pushes the French political theater in a move to ... ostracize . "'' Ouuupppps !!!), many would resume; Examples like these are too many! And a careful reader can only continue against the heart annoyed his reading. The only reasons to persevere is the tone and pitch of view of reflection, and also the unusual theses based on a striking historical scholarship, surprising even in one of those journalists today, the temptation heartbreaking is to write about everything, anything, anyhow, after exhausting their ability to play "Lady Sun" about the news. The impression remains unfinished, insufficient rigor, as if the author, "doctus cum libro" but confused, had not managed to master a large and solid documentation or to draw fluid and book Clearly, not having "a hundred times on the loom, ...". Too rushed, Mr. Zemmour, but interesting 'still ...
