Now after Leica without always knowing where it came out and really manufactured them is always (digital) with Sony lenses that I found the so-called quality, and this equipment is no exception. Yes, I think the problem lies elsewhere. It has now been absurdly beautiful summarize the supreme destiny of humanity to this compulsive obsession that is the smartphone, I wonder why want to do absolutely everything with (soon also a razor grille on the side?) when it is so simple to have beside a small camera of very high or even much better still.
And this, without putting in motion a gas plant. First here we wrongly speaks of camera. It is excessive, or at least extensive. A camera, and you take the sofa bed, you make a picture. There, not possible, as is we do not do photo. Only a large appendix, including a set of interchangeable term possibly goals and an interface for stowage (therefore, mandatory) to a smartphone. Complicated stowage and, in addition, require prior to download an ad hoc application.
So yes, it is high tech, it's geek, that's all you want, but you speak of an augmented gasworks polytechnic trend headlock, both to install all that (the coup by time, every time you want to make a picture?) then to the said picture (that has nothing flash, it can be said!) and master all the possibilities. Why then do so complicated when for the same price and infinitely easier, you can have just a "real" camera separated (possibly a hybrid with interchangeable lenses too) for a result perhaps even higher?
Separate camera which, anyway, will not be heavier or bulkier here that you are forced to lug around more equally, big goal and interface. In short, I remain perplexed. And I wonder if such equipment has a future, including from professionals (let me laugh ...). However good point for consumer purchasers: finally a real user manual, without anyone forcing us to much hassle to find him God knows where on the Internet, as has become fashionable.