Zoopa 150 Turbo vs. Zoopa 150 Turbo 2.4 GHz

I have time to Zoopa brought 150 Turbo (infrared) and was thrilled with his flight, he had the "Revell Hornet" are absolutely in the rain. With practice, patience and the occasional crash (which the Zoopa really easy put away) so you can already really fly. Unfortunately, no longer worked for me after 1 week of the tail rotor, which was resolved quite quickly thanks guarantee. Since I discovered that there will be the 150 Turbo Zoopa as 2.4 GHz version and have given him unceremoniously.
Now I can both in comparisons.

What is there to say about the two General:

Clean design (housing Metal, plastic cover)
Small & heavier than the 'Revell Hornet'
Very robust
Clean flying characteristics
100% suitable for beginners (by coaxial rotor)
With the USB charging very low latency (USB charging cable Flashback manCopter Zoopa150)
3 channel (forward / backward; turn right / left, up / down)
Gyro technology

In appearance they do not differ much. In the 2.4 GHz model of the infrared receiver of the stand out somewhat and the rotors is also 2.4 GHz missing.

There are a few changes to the remote control:
Infrared channel (ABC) is eliminated.
The key to the on and off LED light has been assigned to another function and is now to retain the helicopter on the remote control.
There is thus no longer button on and off the LED light.
Turbo button remains the same.

For flight behavior:
It feels a very significant difference to the infrared model. By 2.4 GHz there are no more delays ie the helicopter responds more directly to the control commands. In addition, the range of the helicopter is clearly increasing. Overall, it is now easier to fly accurate. My personal impression was that he also much quieter in the air floats (is perhaps because that's version crashed already often times my infrared: D).

Also, any problems you have with infrared so (delay, no reaction of the helicopter, etc ...) no longer exist.

Everything must in all and I really want to know about this!