Jai a little hard to understand the criticism against this item. Regarding the Judenräte and bureaucratic role Deichmann HA merely incorporates recent work lépoque to Raul Hilberg, who showed in the destruction of European Jewry (Volume 1) that the genocide was also a bureaucratic process in which the Nazis had managed to secure the participation of their victims. There is here no despondency thereof; title louvrage (the expression napparait dailleurs Quà the last page) didnt object to clear the accused or his accomplices; rather the combination of bureaucracy and terror is the singularity of the crime; the fact that it appears as a rather limited character reinforces this singularity. What one could blame the book is that it is closer to the history book as the record of the trial which is expected in more detail; I noticed when even criticism of Eichmann's lawyer described as incompetent. Major work in the historiography even if Hilberg is the historical reference
