But now to the actual review of the shaving head. To be honest, I use my Arcitec now much much better and much more than a wet shave in the traditional manner with "normal" razor perform. The shaving head removed significantly more hair the first time around hover as the shaving head of Arcitecs. I think that is mainly because of the fact that the RQ12 / 60 shaving head with the new "V-Track" technology has, as have the very latest models from Philips of the 9000 series. The RQ12 / 50 shaving head on the other hand does not have this technology, thus distinct points plus for the 60 shaving head.
The price is much cheaper here than in the 50s shaving head, so strong buy recommendation due to the clean shave, the reasonable price and the great upgrade that Philips makes its customers possible. After all, one saves at least 200 euros for a razor with comparable blades, hence the now somewhat dated Arcitec is another modern great razor. Imagine only once, Apple would do this to his Smartphone and so, then no one would indeed buy the new 6)
Greetings,
Charly
UPDATE 31/12/14:
Hello again,
now I use the shaving head about 6 months and I'm still excited. In conjunction with my cleaning station, where he is again "maintained" a week, he makes me still loyal service.
I prefer me to shave "wet" heist with shaving cream and water, which the razor and the shaving head so far well tolerated.
Qualitatively, I think, the shaving performance by 1/4 "consumption" of the shaving head remained (according to Philips) constant as at the beginning.
However, I can not understand some reviews here, in which the shaving head does not fit or the shaving head is qualitatively worse than the RQ12 / 50.