Technology:
I had a fear that the single player so as the multiplayer beta (graphically). However, God was not due to be the case. Crysis 3 is the best for me graphically shooter on PS3. Killzone 3 and Crysis 3 are at about the same graphic level. In Crysis 3 but just adds that you also recognize that this game has a good physics engine. Just this physics engine is no longer used in most other shooters. Even the tall grass and the Vegitation see themselves on the PS3 still really very good. My 6 year old computer with which I have Crysis 1 gambled that time would probably put this game no longer at the run. Although not everything always looks smooth 100%, but in fight scenes I could see no strong framerate dips.
Even otherwise, the game ran at me without a single bug or crash. Even in multiplayer I had a new migration only once.
Sound: The sound is also well done again. Although me the soundtrack of Crysis 2. liked a little better, but the third part does not need to hide.
Gameplay / story: Here is the reason for a star deduction. Crysis 3 is just very boring. That is also the reason why Crysis 3 is worse than the 2nd part and the part is 1.
FarCry 1 offered expansive levels on an island with good AI opponents, Crysis 1 offered the same only more beautiful and there was a new story. Part 2 changed the scenario in the city and the story moved at the end but then again positively. The season was up to 1 part higher than in Crysis 3. I have the game 2 times through gambled and did good 15 hours needed to all single player to have trophies.
The gameplay is unfortunately very monotonous: opponents makieren, off next area. Could save this dull gameplay perhaps an interesting story, but no, instead we get suddenly "dramatic" shown moments that are not at all but daramtisch. The main reason is because the story can not establish a proper drama. The story was in Crysis never really particularly good, but still quite entertaining, but at the 3rd part has simply messed up.
It looks as if you wanted only a concept (that nature again reclaimed the world) and only then tried with what you have as a concept to create a story around it. The story simply does not provide the highlights. Also no Epicmoments. In Crysis 2 at least the Final Fixing was designed pretty epic and the scenery was not bad. But at Crysis 3 simply missed something special. It is no longer really remember Crysis 3 in a few years. Since it except a very good technical implementation is nothing what is memorable. Crysis 3 will be the most expensive product of Crytek. Had only 1/8 spent on the plot would have come probably a better play. Crysis 3 actually plays like an addon or a big DLC for Crysis 2. The jump from Crysis 1 to Crysis 2 was simply much greater than now. Yes, the levels are spacious and most fantastic view. But they are often empty and the freedom is limited rather to the effect if you take the left path or the right path. Without big impact.
Multiplayer: The may look graphically not quite as good as the single player, but offers many modes and maps are also usually very good. For me, Crysis 3 offers the best multiplayer of all Crytek games. The maps are large, but not too large, the level up is solid implemented. Only a text chat was missing.
Especially good is, Crysis 3 does not provide online passport and can therefore be readily gambled.
Conclusion: Now that I have the game 2 times through gambled and graduated in Multiplayer Level 20, I sold the game again. Crysis 3 is a technically good shoot 'em out, but besides that can not stand out. Clear a few scenes, especially the dam level look very good, but gameplay and story draw Crysis 3 just too down. Crysis 3 does not do much wrong, but I expected more. Without the good graphics, the sound and the omission of multiplayer online passport I would give Crysis 3 only 3 star, so it has become a 4 star now. For those who want to pick up the game, I still advise you to wait until the game a prize of 35 has. For 60 I think it's for me personally too expensive.