DRIFT HD

I must also say that I have professional claims aer. Therefore seen, I went in front in accordance with the search. For the
Home there will be certainly other benchmarks. Here are allowed to be maybe more of marketing strategic aspects
tempt. You have to be absolutely clear that all cameras are not to compare with a SONY EX1R - I have in use.
One must in any case - in particular - to cut back, and that extreme. Here a compromise is required in which the run-up to
it must be clear what you want to do without or can.

When looking course I also came across the industry leader GoPro and Contour. Value I placed on the opportunity to get a broadly applicable camera
should in addition to the quality aspects include features, such as. a built-in screen in order to make the orientation as comfortable as possible.
Actionpro eliminated because hereby the screen only shows a portion of the actual image. Retired also GoPro Hero 2 because - just as in the Actionpro -
the camera on the helmet (Teletubby look) must be mounted and by the massive product design a noticeable wind resistance arises.

After some research, I came to Drift Innovation. Test results and comparison of the raw material showed quite similar image qualities with the GoPro,
and - in my opinion - even, at least with regard to the color reproduction, a better picture. GoPro seems seen the footage of the software here,
extremely affecting what is precisely no effect on the drift. Only the focus is a little reduced, at least in the detail sharpness of fine structures up
due.

In the basic settings (720p / 50 fps - ie PAL) gives an idea of ​​what impressed my girlfriend himself. 1080p / 30 fps appear for a DVD production no appreciable
values ​​to offer advantage. As I will hereby behaves in a BD still check.

As scary advantageous feature I look at the Möglichkeitchkeit, - as in Contour - to turn the lens in the axis, which is a direction of the camera at all only
makes possible attachment points easily.

About my editing program (Final Cut Pro), the conversions could make super, but I suspect that the H.264 codec, the part of the camera software
is used, a lot of quality loss brings with it - when data compression is H.264 but extreme.

The camera software is very responsive, which concerns issues such as white balance and bright / dark settings. Absolute reality is faithful color reproduction! This is for me
much more important than subtle nuances in focus - which can be put on a lot easier from a professional software, as a much more extensive color processing.

All in all - I am still in the testing phase - a camera that all can not, however, currently for me the best compromise.