The milk frother Severin was delivered on time, however, would be shipped with in an outer packaging in the almost 3 units can be.
(-) The scope of the base is about twice as thick as the Aeroccino.
(-) The unit will beep when switching on and after program completion
(-) The "Durchschäumung" the milk is not so perfect, there will always be only about 1/2 to 2/3 of the filled milk is transformed into foam
(-) The Betriebsgeräuch is well audible, also the induction unit is cooled by an active fan (approx stops 15s after the program ends)
(-) The whisk is not plastic from metal
(+) The container holds the Severin device about 3 times as much as the Aeroccino, milk foam for cappuccino 2 large works well
(+) The temperature of the milk be regulated (warm to hot)
(+) The container is very easy to clean and has no coating that could be destroyed
(+) Brown sugar or cocoa may be added during operation - without anything burn
(+) Power consumption during operation is lower (see data sheet) - I could not even measure it, so I think that currently
Conclusion: The foam with the Nespresso Aeroccino is fixed and milks independent. With this milk frother, it is a significant time savings because anyway a lot more foam per process is made. On a school grading scale reached for me the Aeroccino a "1" in the foam discipline, the Severin a "2". It would be interesting to know if this is the Plastikrührer is shaped a little different from Nespresso - unfortunately the essays do not fit because the inner diameter is different. Therefore, this remains my guess.
The corpse cleaning for me is clearly a major reason for the Severin.
